Remember the fuss about decisions to abandon specialist science reporting in places like CNN? An underlying theme of the discussion was that science journalism is somehow special. True, maybe, if you are a science writer, but business journalism, law journalism and sports journalism, for example, can all lay claim to needing special expertise and dedicated teams.
It is a shame when any of specialist teams gets the chop. But showing that science is not that special, an item in Cision, Media bulletin, tells us that the piece tells us that the Financial Times has "announced plans to cease sports coverage as of 14th February following ongoing cutbacks at the newspaper".
There is also a report on this development on the Guardian's web site. This tells us that the latest cuts are just the latest of many on the FT.
The good news has to be that science reporting is more important to the FT than sports coverage. If CNN were to chop its sports team, that really would signal the end of civilisation as they know it.
Job ads
Want to advertise your jobs on this page and on the ABSW's members only mailing list?
Details here...
Details here...
Saturday 7 February 2009
Unsporting gesture at the FT
Posted by Unknown at 3:35 pm
Labels: Financial Times, science journalism, sports journalism